|
Skodel Newsletter · September 2026
How Fortescue's Harassment Backflip Interacts With Organisational Justice
In this newsletter
| 1 | A common question |
| 2 | Skodel Case Analysis, Fortescue's Harassment Backflip |
| 3 | Other Common Trigger Events |
| 4 | Hazards At Play |
| 5 | How To Use This In Your Workplace |
| 6 | Example Controls |
|
|
| |
|
Key Figures
|
98
psychosocial matters reported internally at Fortescue in FY26, including 13 inappropriate sexual contact cases and 10 sexual harassment cases
|
$300M
spent by Fortescue on Pilbara site security upgrades (CCTV, deadlocks, lighting) since the 2022 WA mining industry inquiry
|
|
| |
| |
1. A common question
"Isn't this just a mining industry problem that has nothing to do with a standard office workplace?"
The specifics are mining specific, remote camps and fly-in fly-out rosters, but the hazard that stands out most in this case is not. Fortescue publicly defended a decision to keep an executive at work during a harassment investigation, then reversed that decision a week later under pressure. That kind of inconsistent, reactive decision-making is poor organisational justice, one of the 17 recognised psychosocial hazards under the model WHS framework, and it interacts with ordinary processes like performance reviews, restructures and disciplinary action in every industry, not just mining.
|
|
| |
|
Quick reference
Safe Work Australia's model Code of Practice, Managing psychosocial hazards at work
The Code tells employers to consider psychosocial hazards collectively rather than in isolation, because workers can be exposed to more than one hazard at a time and hazards can interact or combine to increase the overall risk. Here's what a PCBU should be weighing in terms of hazard interaction in a case like this.
- Organisational justice hazard. The decision to keep the executive at work was defended publicly, then reversed under pressure a week later, an inconsistent and reactive way to handle a process that affects trust.
- Interacting with remote or isolated work. Workers in camp-based accommodation can't easily be separated from a colleague the way a city-based worker could be offered a period of working from home, so the same inconsistency carries much higher stakes on site.
- Poor support. Retaliation allegations against workers who reported misconduct feed off the first two. If people already doubt the process is fair and know they can't escape the environment either way, they're less likely to report at all.
- Net effect. The hazard goes unresolved for longer, increasing the duration and severity of exposure, exactly what reg 55D requires a PCBU to weigh, not each hazard in isolation.
|
Remote or isolated work
No way to physically escape the hazard
|
→ |
Poor organisational justice
Inconsistent handling erodes trust in the process
|
→ |
Poor support
Fear of retaliation suppresses reporting
|
↻ hazard goes unresolved, exposure lengthens, and the cycle repeats
This collective approach is backed by law, not just guidance. Work Health and Safety (General) Regulations 2022 (WA) reg 55A defines a psychosocial hazard, and reg 55D requires a PCBU to have regard to the extent hazards may interact or combine, alongside the duration, frequency and severity of exposure, when deciding what control measures are appropriate.
Read the primary sources at safeworkaustralia.gov.au and legislation.wa.gov.au.
|
| |
| 2. Skodel Case Analysis |
Fortescue Metals Group |
|
|
On 25 August 2026, Fortescue suspended a senior executive from all duties pending an independent investigation into sexual harassment and bullying allegations, a reversal of its earlier position. A week before, Fortescue's chief executive of growth and energy, Gus Pichot, had defended keeping the executive at work, telling investors the company had "taken extensive external legal and governance advice." A company spokeswoman later confirmed the reversal, saying, "It has been decided that the employee who is the subject of the allegations will not undertake any work for Fortescue while the investigation continues."
This sits alongside a Federal Court class action, filed in June 2026 by law firm JGA Saddler, alleging that women at Fortescue's remote Pilbara camps experienced sexual assault, harassment, discrimination and retaliation for reporting misconduct. Fortescue's own FY26 sustainability reporting discloses 98 psychosocial matters raised internally that year alone.
The angle that matters most. Commentary on this story understandably focuses on the harassment and bullying allegations themselves, but the public defend-then-reverse sequence interacts with poor organisational justice as a hazard of its own, regardless of what the investigation ultimately finds. When a workforce sees a decision publicly defended and then quietly abandoned under pressure, it reasonably wonders whether its own complaints will be handled consistently, or only when enough people are watching.
Mining Weekly, 25 August 2026
Let's look at some potential controls for a hazard like this
Poor organisational justice
Set a documented threshold for interim measures, such as stand-downs, during investigations before a case arises, and apply it consistently rather than reactively. Communicate the process, not the outcome details, so the workforce understands how these decisions get made.
Remote or isolated work
Provide reporting channels that don't require a worker to raise a complaint with someone they'll see again at camp that evening. Independent, off-site intake matters more where workers can't leave the hazard at the end of a shift.
|
|
| |
|
3. Other Common Trigger Events
|
|
You don't need a class action to see this hazard profile. It shows up in far more ordinary situations.
| A manager publicly reverses a decision under external pressure without explaining why |
Poor organisational justice |
| Staff rostered onto single-person or fly-in fly-out sites with limited contact outside shift hours |
Remote or isolated work |
| A complaint about a colleague sits unactioned for weeks with no update to the person who raised it |
Poor support |
| A restructure is applied to some teams with consultation and others without, and no one explains the difference |
Poor organisational change management |
|
|
| |
|
4. Hazards At Play
|
|
Poor organisational justice
A publicly defended decision was reversed under pressure a week later, undermining confidence in how future complaints will be handled.
|
High |
|
Remote or isolated work
Camp-based accommodation and shared facilities at Pilbara sites limit workers' ability to escape a hostile colleague outside shift hours.
|
High |
|
Poor support
The class action alleges retaliation against workers who reported misconduct, which discourages the next person from coming forward.
|
Mod-High |
|
|
| |
|
5. How To Use This In Your Workplace
|
- Decide your stand-down or interim-measures threshold for serious misconduct investigations before you need it, not while a live case is under public scrutiny.
- Audit whether your reporting channels actually work for the people furthest from head office, including shift workers, remote or field-based staff and contractors, not just those near HR.
- Ask your workforce, not just your leadership team, whether they believe complaints get handled fairly. If you don't know the answer, that's a signal worth acting on in itself.
|
|
| |
|
6. Example Controls
Starting points, not a checklist. Every workplace needs to assess and tailor its own controls.
Poor organisational justice
- Pre-agree and document decision thresholds for disciplinary and investigation processes so they're applied consistently, not reactively.
- Give people subject to a decision, and where appropriate the wider team, a clear explanation of process and timeframe, even when outcome details must stay confidential.
All 17 hazard categories, with practical controls for each.
|
| |
|
Upcoming Webinar · 18 September 2026
Psychosocial Hazards in the Workplace: From Compliance Obligation to Practical Action
With Benchmark OHS, presented by Sam McKenzie, Ian Fagan and Ben Chinwah
|
| |
|
Skodel · Psychosocial risk assessment for Australian workplaces · skodel.com
|
|
.png)
.png)
.png)