Record sexual harassment payout - employer obligations and strategies

A recent Federal Court decision awarded $305,000 to a former employee in a sexual harassment case. The judgment details the conduct, organisational failings, and legal breaches involved.

‍

This newsletter covers

  • Federal Court decision: case facts
  • Related enforcement action highlighting regulator priorities
  • Employer measures to prevent harassment
  • Sample survey questions and follow up process for workplace monitoring

‍

Federal court decision – key facts

A former employee of a Mad Mex franchise was awarded $305,000 in damages by the Federal Court after being subjected to repeated sexual harassment and victimisation.

‍

Read full story here

‍

‍

Key facts

‍

Key facts in the case

‍

Related enforcement action – common failures across cases

‍

The Mad Mex case is not isolated. In July 2025, WorkSafe Victoria charged a caravan park and its director following allegations of sexual harassment of a female employee.

In both the Federal Court decision and the caravan park prosecution, the absence of clear prevention measures was central.

‍

‍

These matters show that different regulators apply similar expectations across industries: employers must have documented policies, provide training, conduct risk assessments and ensure staff know how to report harassment.

‍

Employer Measures to Prevent Harassment

‍

Employers are required to take proactive steps to eliminate sexual harassment under the Sex Discrimination Act and work health and safety laws.

‍

Employer measures to prevent harassment

‍

Workplace survey – example questions

‍

Sample questions to include in staff surveys to assess risk levels:

  1. I feel safe and supported to report harmful behaviour
    1. Strongly disagree to strongly agree
  2. Have you witnessed behaviour or comments that could be considered harassment?
    1. Yes, I have experienced it
    2. Yes, I have observed it
    3. No
    4. Prefer not to say
  3. I am aware of the procedure to report workplace harassment
    1. Strongly disagree to strongly agree
  4. I believe reports of this behaviour are taken seriously and addressed fairly
    1. Strongly disagree to strongly agree

‍

Interpreting and following up the results

‍

Interpreting survey results and follow up actions

‍

Do you have operations in QLD?

‍

We have summarised the mandatory harassment prevention plan code of practice for you into one simple excel. Reach out to info@skodel.com if you are interested in getting access.

‍

We hope you found this helpful and as always, thank you so much for reading